|
DEFINITION OF SOIL ORGANIC MATTER
by Jerzy Weber 1. Definition of humic
substances
|
|
1. Definition of humic substances Agriculturist since ancient times have recognized significant
benefits of soil organic matter (SOM) to crop productivity. These benefits have
been the subject of controversy for centuries and some are still debated today.
One of the major problems in communicating in the field of humic substances is the lack of precise definitions for unambiguosly specifying the various fractions. Unfortunately, the terminology is not used in a consistent manner. The term humus is used by some soil scientists synonymously with soil organic matter, that is to denote all organic material in the soil, including humic substances. Contemporary, the term humus is frequently used to represent only the humic substances. The term SOM is generally used to represent the organic constituents in the soil, including undecayed plant and animal tissues, their partial decomposition products, and the soil biomass. Thus, this term includes: 1. identifiable, high-molecular-weight organic materials such as polysaccharides and proteins, 2. simpler substances such as sugars, amino acids, and other small molecules, 3. humic substances. It is likely that SOM contains most if not all of the organic compounds synthesized by living organisms. SOM is frequently said to consist of humic substances and nonhumic substances. Nonhumic substances are all those materials that can be placed in one of the categories of discrete compounds such as sugars, amino acids, fats and so on. Humic substances are the other, unidentifiable components. Even this apparently simple distinction, however, is not as clear cut as it might appear. Distribution SOM is shown on the picture:
Organic compounds of soil - live organisms and their undecomposed, partly decomposed and completely decomposed remains as well as products of their transformation. Living organisms alive - edaphon. Soil organic matter - non-living components which are a heterogeneous mixture composed largely of products resulting from microbal and chemical transformations of organic debris. Soil organic matter can exist in different morphological patterns, which are the bases of the classification of so called forms and types of humus. Unaltered materials - fresh and non-transformed components of older debris. Transformed products - (humus) - bearing no morphological resemblance to the structures from which they were derived.These transformed components are reffered to as the humification processproducts. Humic substances- a series of relativelyhigh-molecular-weight, brown to black colored substances formed by secondary synthesis reactions. The term is used as a generic name to describe tocolored material or its fractions obtained on the basis of solubilitycharacteristics:
Nonhumic substances- compounds belongingto known classes of bichemistry, such as:
The
chemical and colloidal properties of SOM can be studied only in the freestate,
that is, when freed of inorganic soil components. Thus the first taskof the
researcher is to separate organic matter from the inorganic matrixof sand,
silt, and clay. |
|
2. Function of organic matter in soil Organic matter contributes to plant growth through its effect on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the soil. It has a:
Humus also plays an indirect role in soil through its effect on the uptake of micronutrients by plants and the performance of herbicides and other agricultural chemicals. It should be emphasized that the importance of any given factor will vary from one soil to another and will depend upon such environmental conditions as climate and crpping history. Availability of nutrients for planth growth Effect on soil physical condition, soil erosion and soil
buffering and exchange capacity Effect on soil biological condition |
3. The formation of humic substances
The formation of humic substances is one of the least understood
aspects of humus chemistry and one of the most intriguing. Studies on this
subject are of long-standing and continued research can be justified on
theoretical and practical grounds.
Several pathways exist for the formation
of humic substances during the decay of plant and animal remains in soil, the
main ones being shown in the picture:The classical theory, popularized by
Waksman, is that humic substances represent modified lignins (pathway 1) but
the majority of present-day investigators favor a mechanism involving quinones
(pathway 2 and 3). In practice all four pathways must be considered as likely
mechanisms for the synthesis of humic and fulvic acids in nature, including
sugar-amine condensation (pathway 4).This four pathways may operate in all
soils, but not to the same extent or in the same order of importance. A lignin
pathway may predominate in poorly drained soils and wet sediments (swamps,
etc.) whereas synthesis from polyphenols may be of considerable importance in
certain forest soils. The frequent and sharp fluctuations in temperature,
moisture and irradiation in terrestrial surface soils under a harsh
continental.

Pathway 1 - The lignin theory
For many years it was thought that humic
substances were derived from lignin (pathway 1). According to this theory,
lignin is incompletely utilized by microorganism and the residuum becomes part
of the soil humus. Modification in lignin include loss of methoxyl (OCH3)
groups with the generation of o-hydroxyphenols and oxidation of aliphatic side
chains to form COOH groups. The modified material is subject to further unknown
changes to yield first humic acids and then fulvic acids.This pathway,
illustrated on the picture , is exemplified by Waksman's lignin-protein
theory.
The following evidence was cited by Waksman in support of the
lignin theory of humic acid formation:
Although
lignin is less easily attacked by microorganisms than other plant components,
mechanisms exist in nature for its complete aerobic decomposition. Otherwise
undecomposed plant remains would accumulate on the soil surface and the organic
matter content of the soil would gradually increase until CO2 was depleted from
the atmosphere. The ability of soil organisms to degrade lignin has been
understimated in some quarters and its contribution to humus has been
exaggerated.
In normally aerobic soils lignin may be broken down into
low-molecular-weight products prior to humus synthesis.On the other hand, the
fungi that degrade lignin are not normally found in excessively wet
sediments.Accordingly, it seems logical to assume that modified lignins may
make a major contribution to the humus of peat, lake sediments, and poorly
drained soils.

Pathway 2 and 3 - The polyphenol theory
In pathway 3 lignin still plays
an important role in humus synthesis, but in a different way. In this case
phenolic aldehydes and acids released from lignin during microbiological attack
undergo enzymatic conversion to quinones, which polymerize in the presence or
absence of amino compounds to form humiclike macromolecules.
Pathway 2 is
somewhat similar to pathway 3 except that the polyphenols are synthesized by
microorganisms from nonlignin C sources (e.g., celulose). The polyphenols are
then enzymatically oxidized to quinones and converted to humic substances.As
noted earlier, the classical theory of Waksman is now considered obsolete by
many investigators. According to current concepts quinones of lignin origin,
together with those synthesized by microorganisms, are the major building
blocks from which humic substances are formed.
The formation of
brown-colored substances by reactions involving quinones is not rare event, but
is a well-known phenomenon that takes place in melanine formation, such as in
the flesh of ripe fruits and vegetables following mechanical injury and during
seed coat formation.
Possible sources of phenols for humus synthesis
include lignin, microorganisms, uncombined phenols in plants and tannins.Of
these, only the first two have received serious attention.
Flaig's
concept of humus formation is:
1. Lignin, freed of its linkage with cellulose during decomposition of plant residues, is subjected to oxidative splitting with the formation of primary structural units (derivatives of phenylpropane).
2. The side-chains of the lignin-building units are oxidized, demethylation occurs, and the resulting polyphenols are converted to quinones by polyphenoloxidase enzymes.
3. Quinones arising from the lignin (and from other sources) react with N-containing compounds to form dark-colored polymers.
The role of microorganisms as sources of polyphenols has been
emphasized by Kononova.She concluded that humic substances were being formed by
cellulose-decomposing myxobacteria prior to lignin decomposition.
The
stages leading to the formation of humic substances were postulated to
be:
1. Fungi attack simple carbohydrates and parts of the protein and cellulose in the medullary rays, cambrium, and cortex of plants residues.
2. Cellulose of the xylem is decomposed by aerobic myxobacteria. Polyphenols synthesized by the myxobacteria are oxidized to quinones by polyphenoloxidase enzymes, and the quinones subsequently react with N compounds to form brown humic substances.
3. Lignin is decomposed. Phenols released during decay also serve as source materials for humus synthesis.

Pathway 4 - Sugar-amine condensation
The notion that humus is formed
from sugars (pathway 4) dates back to the early days of humus chemistry.
According to this concept reducing sugars and amino acids, formed as
by-products of microbial metabolism, undergo nonenzymatic polymerization to
form brown nitrogenous polymers of the type produced during dehydratation of
certain food products at moderate temperatures.
A major objection to this
theory is that the reaction proceeds rather slowly at the temperatures found
under normal soil conditions. However, drastic and frequent changes in the soil
environment (freezing and thawing, wetting and drying), together with the
intermixing of reactants with mineral material having catalytic properties, may
facilitate condensation. An attractive feature of the theory is that the
reactants (sugars, amino acids etc.) are produced in abundance through the
activities of microorganisms.
The initial reaction in sugar-amine
condensation involves addition of the amine to the aldehyde group of the sugar
to form the n-substituted glycosylamine. The glycosylamine subsequently
undergoes to form the N-substituted-1-amino-deoxy-2-ketose. This is subject to:
fragmentation and formation of 3-carbon chain aldehydes and ketones, such as
acetol, diacetyl etc.; dehydration and formation reductones and hydroxymethyl
furfurals.
All of these compounds are highly reactive and readily
polymerize in the presence of amino compounds to form brown-colored
products.

4. Properties of humic substances
Humic acids - the fraction of humic substances that is not soluble in water under acidic conditions (pH < 2) but is soluble at higher pH values. They can be extracted from soil by various reagents and which is insoluble in dilute acid. Humic acids are the major extractable component of soil humic substances. They are dark brown to black in color.
Fulvic acids - the fraction of humic substances that is soluble in water under all pH conditions. They remains in solution after removal of humic acid by acidification. Fulvic acids are light yellow to yellow-brown in color.
Humin - the fraction of humic substances that is not soluble in water at any pH value and in alkali. Humins are black in color.
Many investigators now belive that all dark colored humic
substances are part of a system of closely related, but not completely
identical, high - molecular - weight polymers. According to this concept,
diferences between humic acids and fulvic acids, can be explained by variations
in molecular weight, numbers of functional groups (carboxyl, phenolic OH) and
extent of polymerization.
The postulated relationships are depicted in
figure , in which it can be seen that carbon and oxygen contents, acidity and
degree of polymerization all change systematically with increasing molecular
weight. The low - molecular - weight fulvic acids have higher oxygen but lower
carbon contents than the high - molecular - weight humic acids. Fulvic acids
contain more functional groups of an acidic nature, particulary COOH. The total
acidities of fulvic acids (900 - 1400 meq/100g) are considerably higher than
for humic acids (400 - 870 meq/100g).
Another important difference is that
while the oxygen in fulvic acids can be accounted for largely in known
functional groups (COOH, OH, C=O), a high portion of the oxygen in
humic acids seems to occur as a structural component of the nucleus.
Electron microscope observations revealed the humic acids of different soils to
have polymeric structure, appearing in form of rings, chains, and clusters. The
sizes of their macromolecules can range from 60 - 500 A, what is mainly decided
of by the occuring humification process, which also exerts an influence on
their spatial sructure. Compared to other taxonomic units, the polymers of
podsol- earth soils showed to most loose structure.

Electron microscope observations of humic acids (Drozd 1978)
|
Humic acids of peaty sandy hydro earth soil |
Humic acids of haplic phaeozems |
Humic acids of podzolic soil |
|
|
|
|
Is apparent
that humic substances consist of a heterogeneous mixture of compounds for which
no single structural formula will suffice.
Humic acids are thought to be
complex aromatic macromolecules with amino acids, amino sugars, peptides,
aliphatic compounds involved in linkages between the aromatic groups. The
hypothetical structure for humic acid, shown in figure, contains free and bound
phenolic OH groups, quinone structures, nitrogen and oxygen as bridge units and
COOH groups variously placed on aromatic rings.

The hypothetical model structure of fulvic acid (Buffle's
model) contains both aromatic and aliphatic structures, both extensively
substituted with oxygen - containing functional groups.

Elemental composition of humic substances and several
plant material (by Kononova)
|
Substances |
% dry ash-free basis |
|||
|
C |
H |
O |
N |
|
|
Fulvic acids |
44 - 49 |
3,5 - 5,0 |
44 - 49 |
2,0 - 4,0 |
|
Humic acids |
52 - 62 |
3,0 - 5,5 |
30 - 33 |
3,5 - 5,0 |
|
Proteins |
50 - 55 |
6,5 - 7,3 |
19 - 24 |
15,0 - 19,0 |
|
Lignin |
62 - 69 |
5,0 - 6,5 |
26 - 33 |
- |
The humic acid/fulvic acid ratio
The percentage of the humus which occurs in the various humic fractions varies considerably from one soil type to another. The humus of forest soils is characterized by a high content of fulvic acids while the humus of peat and grassland soils is high in humic acids.(see figure) The humic acid/fulvic acid ratio usually, but not always, decreases with increasing depth.

Humic acid/fulvic acid ratios of some surface soils (by Kononova)
|
Soil |
Humic
acid/ |
Soil |
Humic
acid/ |
|
Chernozem ordinary |
2.0 - 2.5 |
Gray forest |
1.0 |
|
Chernozem deep |
1.7 |
Sod podzolic |
0.8 |
|
Chestnut dark |
1.5 - 1.7 |
Tundra |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Non- humic substances characteristics Soil carbohydrates Signifcance of carbohydrates The major groups of carbohydrates 1. Monosaccharides, which are aldehyde and ketone derivatives of the higher polyhydric alcohols.
2. Oligosaccharides, a large group of polymeric carbohydrates consisting of a relatively few monosaccharide units.
3. Polysaccharides, contain many monomeric units (8 or more)
The carbohydrates material in soil occurs as: 1. free sugars in the soil solution 2. complex polysaccharides 3. polymeric molecules of various sizes and shapes which are so strongly attached to clay and/or humic colloids. The cotribution of individual sugar types to soil organic matter:
Soil lipids
Amino acids 1. As free amino acids o in the soil solution o in soil micropores
2. As amino acids, peptides or proteins bound to clay minerals o on external surfaces o on internal surfaces
3. As amino acids, peptides or proteins bound to humic colloids o H-bonding and van der Waals' forces o in covalent linkage as quinoid-amino acid complexes
4. As mucoproteins 5. As a muramic acid
Amino acids, being readily decomposed by microorganisms, have
only an ephemeral existence in soil. Thus the amounts present in the soil
solution at any one time represent a balance between synthesis and destruction
by microorganisms. |
|
6. Humic substances complexes with mineral components Connection of humic substances with mineral
fraction 1. As salts of low - molecular organic acids (acetate, oxalate, lactate and others). 2. As salts of humic substances with alkaline cations - humate, fulvate. 3. As chelate with metal ions. 4. As substances held on clay mineral surfaces. Salts of low - molecular organic acids
They are the most characteristic compounds of soil humic substances. The alkaline cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) are held primarily by simple cation exchange with COOH groups (RCOONa, RCOOK etc.). The humate and fulvate occur in soil largely as mixture with hydroxide of Fe and Al. Chelate with metal ions -O- > -NH2 > -N=N- > =N > -COO- > -O- > C=O The order of decreasing ability of metal ions to chelating is as follows: Fe3+ > Cu2+ > Ni2+ > Co2+ > Zn2+ > Fe2+ > Mn2+ The complexing ability of humic and fulvic acids results largely from their content of oxygen-containing functional groups, such as COOH, phenolic OH and C=O group. Soil organic constituents form both soluble and insoluble complexes with metal ions and thereby play a dual role in soil. Low - molecular - weight compounds (biochemicals, fulvic acids) bring about the solubilization of metal ions and affect their transport to plant roots. In contrast, high - molecular - weight compounds (e.g. humic acids) function as a "sink" for polyvalent cations. Natural complexing agents are of considerable importance in weathering processes and in the movement of sesquioxides into the subsoil. Clay - organic complexes The interaction of organic substances with clay has a multitude of consequences that are reflested in the physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil matrix. Several mechanisms are involved in the adsorption of humic substances by clay minerals, the main ones being:
Van der Waals' forces
Adsorption caused by van der Waals' forces can be of considerable importance in the adsorption of neutral polar and nonpolar molecules, particulary those which are high in molecular weight. Bonding by cation bridging Since organic anions are normally repelled from negatively charged clay surfaces, adsorption of humic and fulvic acids by clay minerals such as montmorillonite occurs only when polyvalent cations are present on the exchange complex. Unlike Na+ and K+, polyvalent cations are able to maintain neutrality at the surface by neutralizing both the charge on the clay and the acidic functional group of the organic matter (e.g. COO-). The main polyvalent cations responsible for the binding of humic and fulvic acids to soil clays are Ca2+, Fe3+ and Al3+. The divalent Ca2+ ion doesn't form strong coordination complexes with organic molecules. In contrast Fe3+ and Al3+ form strong coordination complexes with organic compounds. The polyvalent cations act as a bridge between two charged sites.
For a long chain organic molecule, several points of attachment to the clay particle are possible. H - bonding This is a linkage between polar groups of the organic molecule and adsorbed water molecules or oxygens of the silicate surface through bonding with a single H+ ion. The strengh of an individual bond is small, but they are additive thus total adsorption energy can be appreciable. Rigorous drying, such as by desication at the soil surface or consumption of available moisture by plant roots, will tend to increase the bonding between humic material and clay by eliminating hydration water and bringing the humic matter in closer contact to the clay.
H - bonding This is a linkage between polar groups of the organic molecule and adsorbed water molecules or oxygens of the silicate surface through bonding with a single H+ ion. The strengh of an individual bond is small, but they are additive thus total adsorption energy can be appreciable. Rigorous drying, such as by desication at the soil surface or consumption of available moisture by plant roots, will tend to increase the bonding between humic material and clay by eliminating hydration water and bringing the humic matter in closer contact to the clay.
Adsorption by association with hydrous oxides of Fe and Al. For many soils, hydrous oxides are equal in importance to mica-type surfaces in sorbing humic substances. When clay minerals are coated with layers of hydrous oxides their surface reactions are dominated by these oxides rather than the clay. Organic anions can be associated with the oxides by simple coulombic attraction. Anion associated with clay in this manner are readily removed by increasing the pH or by leaching with NaCl or NH4Cl. The fact that very little humic material can be recovered from soils by these treatments suggest that most of the adsorbed organic matter is retained by supplementary machanisms. Coordination or ligand exchange occurs when the anionic group penetrates the coordination shell of Al or Fe and becomes icorporated with the surface OH layer. The sorption of fulvic acid on oxide surfaces is accompanied by displacement of OH groups by COO- ions. The organic anion is not easily displaced with simple salts, although adsorption is pH sensitive. As was the case with organic cations on clay mineral surfaces, a very strong bond will result if more than one group on the humic molecule participates.
Adsorption on interlamellar spaces of clay minerals An important mechanisms for retention of proteins and charged organic cations by expandable-layer silicates is through adsorption on interlamellar spaces. Considerably contrversy exist as to whether humic and fulvic acids are bound in this way in the natural soil. Evidence for interlamellar adsorption of fulvic acid by montmorillonite at pH < 5.5 has been given by Schnitzer and Kodama and Theng. The high - molecular - weight humic acids may be too large to penetrate interlamellar spaces. |
|
8. Extraction of humic substances Extraction of Soil Organic Matter The properties of soil organic matter, and especially humic
substances, can be studied only in free state,
that is, when freed of inorganic soil components. Therefore, the first task of
the researcher is to separate organic matter from the inorganic matrix of sand,
silt, and clay. A variety of techniques have been employed, depending upon the
nature of the material to be examined. Thus nonpolar compounds like fats,
waxes, resins, etc. can be extracted with such organic solvents as hexane,
ether, alcohol-benzene mixtures, and others. Hydrolysis prosedures have been
used for isolating individual monomers, such as amino acids and sugars. 1. the method leads to the isolation of unaltered material 2. the extracted humic substances are free of inorganic contaminants, such as clay and polyvalent cations 3. extraction is complete, thereby insuring representation of fractions from the entire molecular-weight range 4. the method is universally applicable to all soils Reagents used for extraction of organic constituents from soil (Stevenson 1982)
Alkali extraction NaOH solution of 0.1 to 0.5N concetration in water and a soil to extractant ratio of from 1:2 to 1:5 (g/ml) have been widely used for recovering organic matter.Repeated extraction is required to obtain maximum recovery. Leaching the soil with dilute HCl, which removes Ca and other polyvalent cations, increases the efficiency of extraction of organic matter with alkaline reagents. As a general rule, extraction of soil with 0.1 or 0.5N NaOH leads to the recovery of approximately two-thirds of the soil organic matter. Undesirable features of alkali extraction are as follows: 1. Alkali solutions dissolve silica from the mineral matter and this silica contaminates the organic fractions separated from the extract. 2. Alkali solutions dissolve protoplasmic and structural components from fresh organic tissues and these become mixed with the humified organic matter. 3. Under alkaline conditions, autoxidation of some organic constituents occurs in contact with air both during extraction and when the extracts are allowed to stand. 4. Other chemical changes can occur in alkaline solution like condensation between amino acids and aldehydes or quinones. The more alkaline the solution and the longer the extraction period the greater will be the chemical changes. The amount of organic matter extracted from soil with caustic alkali increases with time of extraction. Mild extractans Several milder and more selective extractans have been
recommended in recent years as alternatives for the classical extraction with
strong alkali. Included are salts of complexing agents
(Na4P2O7 and EDTA), organic complexing agents
in aqueous media (acetylacetone), and organic solvents of various types.Whereas
less alternation of organic matter may result, these extractans are much less
effective than alkali hydroxides in removing organic matter. The main exepction
being the illuvial (B) horizon of the Spodosol. As was the case with alkali
extraction, recovery of organic matter frequently can be increased by
pretreating the soil with mineral acids to remove carbonates (HCl) or silicates
(HCl-HF mixtures). Na4P2O7 and other neutral salts In many soils, Ca and other polyvalent cations (Fe, Al) are
responsible for maintaining organic matter in a flocculated and insoluble
condition. Accordingly, reagents that inactivate these cations by forming
insoluble precipitates or soluble coordination complexes lead to solubilization
of the organic matter. Such reagents as ammonium oxalate, sodium pyrophosphate
and salts of weak organic acids have been used for this purpose. Formic acid - HCOOH Extensive research on the extraction of soil organic matter with
formic acid shows that under certain circumstances up to 55% of the organic
matter in mineral soils and as much as 80% of that in composts can be extracted
with formic acid containing LiF, LiBr or HBF4 (see picture).
Organic chelating agents Organic compounds such as acetylacetone, cupferron and hydroxyquinoline, which are capable of forming chelate complexes with polyvalent metal ions, have been used for extracting illuvial organic matter from Spodosols. The organic matter in the B horizon of these soils occurs as complexes with Fe and Al and the complexing of these metals by chelating agents releases the organic matter to soluble forms.Organic chelating agents are rather ineffective for extracting organic matter from other soil types. Outline of extraction procedures in IHSS method Step 1. Equilibrate the sample to a pH value between 1-2 with 1 M HCl at room teperature. Adjust solution volume with 0.1 M HCl to provide a final concentration that has ratio of 10 mL liquid/1 g dry sample. Shake the suspencion for 1 hour. Step 2. Separate supernatant from the residue by decantation after allowing solution to settle (or by low speed centrifugation). Save supernatant for XAD-8 isolation. Step 3. Neutralize the soil residue with 1 M NaOH to pH=7.0 then add 0.1 NaOH under an athmosphere of N2 to give a final extractant to soil ratio of 10:1. Step 4. Extract the suspension under N2 with intermittent shaking for a minimum of 4 hours. Allow the alkaline suspension to settle overnight and collect the supernatant by means of decantation or centrifugation. Step 5. Acidify the supernatant with 6 M HCl with constant stirring to pH=1.0 and then allow the suspension to stand for 12-16 hours. Step 6. Centrifuge to separate the humic acid (precipitate) and fulvic acid (supernatant - FA Extract 2) fractions. Step 7. Redissolve the humic acid fraction by adding a minimum volume of 0.1 M KOH under N2. Add solid KCl to attain 0.3 M (K+) and then centrifuge at high speed to remove suspended solids. Step 8. Reprecipitate the humic acid as in step 5. Centrifuge and discard supernatant. Step 9. Suspend the humic acid precipitate in 0.1 M HCl/0.3 M HF solution in a plastic container. Shake overnight at room temperature. Step 10. Centrifuge and repeat HCl/HF treatment(step 9), if necessary, until the ash content is below 1 percent. Step 11. Transfer the precipitate to a Visking dialysis tube by slurring wiyh water and dialyze against distilled water until the dialysis watr gives a nagative Cl- test with the AgNO3. Step 12. Freeze-dry the humic acid. Step 13. Pass the supernatant from step 2 through a column of XAD-8 (0.15 ml of resin per gram of initial sample dry weight at a flow rate of 15 bed volumes per hour). Discard the effluent, rinse the XAD-8 column containing sorbed fulvic acid with 0.65 column volumes of distilled water. Step 14. Back elute the XAD-8 column with 1 column volume of 0.1 M NaOH, followed by 2-3 column volumes of distilled water. Step 15. Immediately acidify with 6 M HCl to pH=1. Add concentrated HF to a final concentration of 0.3 M HF. Solution volume should be sufficient to maintain fulvic acid solubility. Step 16. Pass the supernatant from step 6 through a column of XAD-8 (1.0 mL of resin per gram of initial sample dry weight). Step 17. Repeat steps 14 and 15 Step 18. Combine the final eluates from steps 15 and 17 and pass this solution through XAD-8 resin in glass column (column volume should be 1/5 of sample volume). Rinse with 0.65 column volumes of distilled water. Step 19. Back elute with 1 column volume of 0.1 M NaOH followed by 2 column volumes of distilled water. Pass eluate through H+- saturated cation exchange resin (Bio-Rad AG-MP-5) using three times the mole of Na ions in solution). Step 20. Freeze-dry the eluate to recover the H+- saturated fulvic acid.
|
||||||||||||||
|
9. Organic forms of soil nitrogen Organic form of soil nitrogen Over 90% of the nitrogen N in the surface layer of most soils occurs in organic forms, with most of the remainder being present as NH4- whichis held within the lattice structures of clayminerals. The surface layerof most cultivated soils contains between0.06 and 0.3% N. Peat soils have high N contents to 3.5%. Plant remains and other debris contribute nitrogen N in the form of: Amino acids
Amino acids exist in soil in several different forms, like: 1. As free amino acids o in the soil solution o in soil micropores
2. As amino acids, peptides or proteins bound to clay minerals o on external surfaces o on internal surfaces
3. As amino acids, peptides or proteins bound to humic colloids o H-bonding and van der Waals' forces o in covalent linkage as quinoid-amino acid complexes
4. As mucoproteins 5. As a muramic acid Amino acids, being readily decomposed by microorganisms, have only anephemeral existence in soil. Thus the amounts present in the soil solutionat any one time represent a balance between synthesis and destruction by microorganisms. The free amino acids content of the soil is strongly influenced by weatherconditions, moisture status of the soil, type of plant and stage of growth,additions of organic residues, and cultural conditions. Amino sugars Amino sugars occur as structal components of a broad group of substances, the mucopolysaccharides and they have been found in combination with mucopeptides and mucoproteins. Some of the amino sugar material in soil may exist in the form of an alkali-insoluble polysaccharide referred to as chitin. Generally the amino sugars in soil are of microbial origin.From 5 to 10%of the N in the surface layer of most soils can be accounted for in N-containing carbohydrates or amino sugars.
Nucleic Acids Nucleic acids, which occur in the cells of all living organisms, consist of individual mononucleotide units (base-sugar-phosphate) joined by a phosphoricacid ester linkage through the sugar.Two types: ribonucleic acid (RNA) anddeoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).They have pentose sugar (ribose or deoxyribose),the purine: adenine, guanine and the pyrimidine: cytosine, thymine.RNA contains also the uracil. The N in purine and pyrimidine bases is usually considered to account forless than 1% of the total soil N. Small amounts of N are extrcted from soil in the form of glycerophosphatides, amines, vitamins, pesticide and pesticide degradation products. Nitrogen transformation A key feature of the internal cycle is the biological turnover of N betweenmineral and organic forms through the opposing processes of mineralizationand immobilization. The latter leads to incorporation of N into microbial tissues. Whereas much of this newly immobilized N is recycled through mineralization, some is converted to stable humus forms. The overall reaction leading to incorporation of inorganic forms of N intostable humus forms is depicted on the picture. Thus the decay of plant and animal residues by microorganisms results in theformation of mineral forms of N (NH4+ and NO3-) and assimilation of part ofthe C into microbial tissue (reaction A). Part of the native humus undergoes a similar fate (reaction B). Subsequent turnover through mineralization-immobilization leads to incorporation of N into stable humus forms (reaction C). Stabilization of N may also occur through the reaction of partial decay products of lignin with nitrogenous constituents (raection D). Except under unusual circumstances, both mineralization and immobilizationalways function in soil, but in opposite direction.
Chemical reaction of ammonia and nitrite with organic matter The fate of mineral forms of N in soil is determined to some
extent bynonbiological reactions involving NH4+,
NH3and NO2- as depicted in fig.
Stability of soil organic nitrogen 1. Proteinaceous constituents are stabilized through their reaction withother organic constituents, such as lignins, tanins, quinons. 2. Biologically resistant complexes are formed in soil by chemical reactionsinvolving NH3+ or NO2-with lignins or humic substances. 3. Adsorption of organic N compounds by clay minerals (pariculary montmorillinitic types) protects the molecule from decomposition. 4. Complexes formed between organic N compounds and polyvalent cations, such as Fe, are biologically stable. 5. Some of the organic N occurs in small pores or voids and is physicallyinaccessible to microorganisms. C/N ratio For surface soils, and for the top layer of lake and marine
sediments, the ratio generally falls within well-defined limits, usually from
about10 to 12. In most soils, the C/N ratio decreases with increasing depth,
often attaining values less than 5.0.Native humus would be expected to have a
lower C/N ratio than most undecayedplant residues for following reasons. The
decay of organic residues by soilorganisms leads to incorporation of part of
the C into microbial tissue with the remainder being liberated as
CO2. As a general rule, about one-third of the applied C in fresh
residues will remain in the soil after the first few months of decomposition.
The decay process is accompanied by conversion of organic form of N to
NH3 and NO3- and soil microorganisms utilize
partof this N for synthesis of new cells. The gradual transformation of
plantraw material into stable organic matter (humus) leads to the
establishmentof reasonably consistent relationship between C and N. Other
factors which may be involved in narrowing of the C/N ratio include chemical
fixation of NH3 or amines by ligninlike substances. |
|
10. Organic forms of soil phosphorus Organic phosphorus Phosphorus rank in importance with N and K as major plant nutrients. Phosphorus compounds in soil can be placed into the following three classes: 1. organic compound of the soil humus, 2. inorganic compounds in which the P is combined with Ca, Mg, Fe, Al and with clay minerals, 3. organic and inorganic P compounds associated with the cells of living matter. Microorganisms are involved in transformations of phosphorus between organic and mineral forms. From 15 to 80% of the phosphorus in soils occurs in organic forms, the exact amount being dependent upon the nature of the soil and its composition. The higher percentages are typical of peats and uncultivated forest soils. From the standpoint of plant nutrion, phosphorus is adsorbed by plants largely as the negatively charged primary and secondary orthophosphate ions (H2PO4- and HPO42-) which are present in the soil solution. Small quantities of soluble organic P compounds are also present in water extracts of soil. The phosphorus cycle In a broad sense, the phosphorus cycle in soil involves the uptake of phosphorus by plants and its return ti the soil in plant and animal residues.
As can be seen from picture three general types of compounds make up the bulk of the organic phosphorus in plants, namely: phytin, phospholipids, and nucleic acids. Approximate recoveries of organic phosphorus in these forms are as follows:
When crop residues are returned to the soil, net immobilization of P will occur when the C/organic- P ratio is 300 or more; net mineralization will result when the ratio is 200 or less. |
||||||||||
|
11. Types of humus in soils Types of humus in soils Humus occurs in soils in many types, differentates in regard to morphology and fractional composition. A type of humus is it a morphological form of naturals accumulation of humic substances in profile or on the surface of soil, conditioned by general direction of soil-forming process and humification of organic matter. A types of humus in terrestrial enviroment are following: 1. mor 2. moder 3. mull Mor is a type of humus, which occur largely in coniferous forest soils and the moorlands soils. This humus arise under conditions of low-biological activity in soil. The mineralization of organic matter proceed slowly and create layers, which maintain a structure of vegatable material.Acidophilic fungi and low activeinvertebrates participates in transformations of plant residues. Under these circumstances forms a litter of large thickness. C/N ratio of mor humus is always more than 20, or even 30-40, whereas pH is acid. Moder is a transitional form of humus between mull and moder, characteristic for sod-podzolic soils, loesses and mountain grassland soils. The organic horizons with moder humus consist of low-thicknessed litter (2-3 cm), which gradually, without bounds, pass on to humus-accumulative horizons. Moder is a type of medium humified humus. Acidophilic fungi and arthropodan participates in transformations of plant residues. C/N ratio equal 15-25. Produced mineral-organic complexes are labile and weakly bounded with mineral portion of soil. Mull is a type of humus characteristic for chestnut soils, phaeozems, rendzinas and others soils. This type of humus arise under grass vegetation. Mull is a well humified organic matter, which is produce in very biologically active habitat. This type of humus is characterized by neutral pH, C/N ratio nearing to 10 and ability to creation stable mineral-organic complexes. Mull is a type of humus which occurs in soils under cultivation. According to Kononova, the types of humus are divide as follows: First type of humus is characteristic for podzolic soils, grey brown soils and lateric soils under forest communities. In this humus predominate humic acids, thus humic acid/fulvic acid ratio is below 1. Humic acid indicate small extent of aromatic rings condensation and they are approximate to fulvic acids. Considerable hydrophilic properties of humic acids favor to creation of chelates with polyvalent cations and ability to displacement deep into profile of soil. Considerable mobility of this humus favor process of podsolization. Second type of humus is characteristic for phaeozems, rendzinas, black earths and brown soils. Humic acid/fulvic acid ratio is upper than 1, Extent of aromatic rings condensation is high in humic acids, which cause their hydrophobic properties and inability to creation of chelates. Humic acids are strongly connected with mineral portion of soil in this type of humus. Third type of humus is characteristic for semidesert soils. In this humus predominate fulvic acids fraction, whereas arise of humic acids is limited. Beyond this, humic acids are largely bounded with mineral portion of soil. |
12. Humus content in soil
Humus content of soil
Humus content in soils fluctuating in broad range. On humus content have influence the following factors:
Humus content in accumulation horizons of the main soil units in Poland (Turski 1996)
|
Division and order |
Type,genera and kind |
Humus content % |
|
Calcisols: |
Calcarious Rendzinas |
3.4 |
|
2.1 - 6.3 |
||
|
4.4 |
||
|
Jurasic Rendzinas |
1.5 - 7.0 |
|
|
Phaeozems: |
Haplic Phaeozems |
2.8 |
|
1.8 - 4.0 |
||
|
Cambisols: |
Brown soils formed from sands |
1.5 |
|
0.9 - 2.2 |
||
|
Brown soils formed from light and medium loams |
1.8 |
|
|
1.1 - 3.0 |
||
|
Brown soils formed from heavy loam |
2.5 |
|
|
1.6 - 3.7 |
||
|
Brown soils formed from silt formations |
1.7 |
|
|
1.3 - 1.9 |
||
|
Brown soils formed from loess and loesslike materials |
1.9 |
|
|
1.4 - 2.6 |
||
|
Luvisols: |
Grey brown soils formed from silt formations |
1.9 |
|
1.4 - 2.4 |
||
|
Grey brown soils formed from loess and loesslike materials |
1.8 |
|
|
1.0 - 2.5 |
||
|
Grey brown soils formed from light loam |
1.6 |
|
|
1.0 - 2.6 |
||
|
Podzols: |
Podzolic soil formed from sands |
1.5 |
|
1.1 - 2.0 |
||
|
Gleysols: |
Boggy soils formed from silts |
1.6 |
|
1.2 - 2.1 |
||
|
Gleysols: |
Black earth formed from sands |
2.8 |
|
1.2 - 4.1 |
||
|
Black earth formed from light and medium loams |
2.6 |
|
|
1.2 - 5.7 |
||
|
Black earth formed from heavy loams and clays |
4.9 |
|
|
2.5 - 5.6 |
||
|
Fluvisols: |
Alluvial soils formed from sands |
2.9 |
|
1.5 - 5.2 |
||
|
Alluvial soils formed from silts |
3.5 |
|
|
1.7 - 5.8 |
||
|
Alluvial soils formed from clays |
4.2 |
|
|
2.4 - 6.8 |
|
13. References 1. Altherton N.M. et al. (1967): Tetrahedron. 23, 1653. 2. Buckman H.C., Brady N.C.. (1971): Gleba i jej w³aciwoci. PWRiL, Warszawa. 3. Buffle J.A.E. (1977): "Les substances humiques et leurs interactions avec les ions mineraux", w: Conference Proceedings de la Commission d'Hydrologie Appliquee de A.G.H.T.M.. l'Universite d'Orsay, 3-10. 4. Danikiewicz W. (1988): Chemia organiczna. WSiP, Warszawa. 5. Drozd J. (1978): Studia nad w³aciwociami chemicznymi i fizykochemicznymi zwi¹zków próchnicznych niektórych jednostek taksonomicznych gleb. Zeszyty Naukowe AR we Wroc³awiu nr.13, Wroc³aw. 6. Drozd J., Weber J. (red.) (1996): The role of humic substances in the ecosystem and in environmental protection. PTSH, Wroc³aw 7. Flaig W. (1966): "The Chemistry of Humic Substances", w: The Use of Isotopes in Soil Organic Matter Studies. Report of FAO/AEA Technical Meeting. Pergamon, New York, 103-127. 8. Fotyma M., Mercik St. (1992): Chemia rolna. PWN, Warszawa. 9. Fuller W.H. et al. (1956): Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc.. 20,218. 10. Gliñski J. (1993): "Chemiczne i fizykochemiczne w³aciwoci gleb", w: red. Dobrzañski B., Zawadzki S., Gleboznawstwo. PWRiL, Warszawa, 155-207. 11. Kononova M.M. (1966): Soil Organic Matter. Pergamon, Oxford. 12. Kononowa M. (1968): Substancje organiczne gleby ich budowa, w³aciwoci i metody badañ. PWRiL, Warszawa. 13. Kowaliñski St. (1993): "Substancja organiczna gleby i jej przeobra¿enia", w: Dobrzañski B., Zawadzki S. (red.), Gleboznawstwo. PWRiL Warszawa, 209-237. 14. Kowda W.A., Griszyna L.A. (1984): Podstawy nauki o glebach. PWRiL, Warszawa. 15. Kumada K. (1987): Chemistry of soil organic matter. Elsevier. 16. Lityñski T., Jurkowska H. (1982): ¯yznoæ gleby i od¿ywianie siê rolin. PWN Warszawa. 17. Mc Carthy P., Malcolm R.L., Clapp C.E., Bloom P.R. (1990): An introduction to soil humic substances, Humic substances in soil and crop sciences: selected readings, W: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science of America. Madison, 1-12. 18. Minakowski W. (1990): Biochemia krêgowców. PWN, Warszawa. 19. Piskornik Z. (1988): Fizjologia rolin cz.1. PWN, Warszawa. 20. Riffaldi R., Schnitzer M. (1972): Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc.. 36, 301. 21. Schnitzer M., Kodama M. (1967): Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc.. 31, 632. 22. Stott D.E., Martin J.P. (1990): "Synthesis and degradation of natural and synthetic humic material in soils", Humic substances in soil and crop sciences: selected readings, w: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science of America. Madison, 37-63. 23. Stevenson F.J. (1979): "Humus", The Encyclopedia of Soil Science Part 1. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Pennsylvania. 24. Stevenson F.J. (1982): Humus chemistry. Genesis, composition, reactions. John Wiley and Sons. 25. Theng B.K.G. (1976): Geoderma. 15, 234. 26. Thompson L.M., Troeh F.R. (1978): Gleba i jej ¿yznoæ. PWRiL, Warszawa. 27. Tinsley J., Walker C.H. (1964): Trans. 8th Intern. Congr. Soil Sci.. 2, 149. 28. Turski R. (1996): Substancja organiczna i jej znaczenie w ekosystemach. Zeszyty Problemowe Postêpów Nauk Rolniczych, z.437. Komitet Gleboznawstwa i Chemii Rolnej PAN, Warszawa, 375-381. 29. Waksman S.A. (1932): Humus, Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore. 30. Wiliams C.B. et al. (1915): Report on the Piedmont Soils pariculary with reference to their nature, plant- food requirements and adaptability for different srops. Bul. North Carol. Depart. Agric., 2, 36. |
|
|
|
|